Mike Vapes

Vaporesso FORZ TX80 – Aegis Killer?

Facebook Comments
Tags

Related Articles

25 Comments

  1. ??
    I wish there were some RTAs built like that tank. Would be perfect for my Aegis Legend. My Kylin V2 has that big bubble glass thats asking to get smashed. Lol

  2. It really has me wondering about your call on this one Mike. I love your reviews but this makes no scene. The Solo is 100watt. It will handle that mod without busting its balls. The only thing taking away from a copy from the Solo is IT'S UNDERPOWERED BY 20% & THAT STUPID CLARK KENT SILVER PLATE PUTTING IT IN DISGUISE BAHAHAHAHA.
    Opp bugger sorry for the caps lock then. Think it was Steve lol. It ain't got shit on Aegis. Busting it's ass trying to lite that atty up at 80watts when it's all it's got.
    Sorry Mike but I'm a bit sus on this review of yours on this one Mate.

  3. Man that's too bad for those of us who boycott Exxon for their oil spill back in the 80s. Also mr. Vapes, Im hoping you're not on their payroll it would be really disappointing.

  4. Hey brother, don't usually comment on videos but I had to on this one. Big fan of vaporesso, love their products… but… Ive been a Geek Vape Aegis user for years and this one kind of burns ? my coils. Why don't they just collaborate with Geek Vape and come up with something together, instead of copying their line of Aegis?! I like the idea behind protecting the tank and the chip set looks different but COME ON! The coil placement, the body of the mod, and practically the same fire button?? Why not give us something original??
    I'm a bit disappointed in Vaporesso for this one. Not cool man, not cool at all… I love your reviews bro and I've been watching you for YEARS! In fact I suggested your channel to a newbie vaper not 3 days ago… but this one, I have to disagree on. You can't compete with an Aegis product when you're obviously copying the Aegis line.
    Gotta say it bro, not even remotely interested in this one. Keep up the great ??work brother.

  5. Looks nice Mike. Aegis copy yeah maybe but fuck geekvape!! I got the the boost plus cause it's advertised as 3 in one still fucking waiting geekvape…… Have sent them numerous emails asking when the other attachments will be released no reply except advertisements on new products so fuck them!!! Sorry bout the rant mate.

  6. Seems everyone is copying the Geek vape Aegis line in one way or another , not a bad thing really , I remember the days when if you dropped a mod it was terminal or at least started it down the line of being KOed soon , I can remember last year wrapping a mod in duct tape just to keep it going ( it was old ) it found the bin eventually lol . Thing that annoys me is that these Aegis look a likes are just that , look a likes , Smok have done one , OBS have done one , there's probably more and more on the way, and now this , do they have no shame ! ( probably not ) or do they lack any original thought ? ( probably ) Vaporesso mods like the Gen series are all basically the same ( and in my opinion a bit boring ) they may be good at what they do , I know people like the ones they have , people buy multis of them and I get it , but why didn't Vaporesso make an IP67 Gen instead of copying an Aegis , can't they think for themselves ? And why now , the Aegis line has been out for ages, have they only just noticed people love the durability of the Aegis , I think its just band wagon jumping . Booo to the lot of them LOL I won't be buying one of these , the only thing I like about the kit is the tank. and the only thing I like about that is the rubberised coating , looks tough , but it isn't a rebuildable and as Mike says its a PITA to service and change the glass if required and it looks difficult to fill , I wouldn't buy it if it was a separate tank on its own . I'm going to have a look at the Axon chipset review now to see if there's any innovation there , willing to bet its the same as the recent Gen chips here goes , Great honest review Mike Vapes as always .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button
Close
Close